NUR 630 Wk 2 Health Care Culture Assignment

NUR 630 Wk 2 Health Care Culture Assignment

Assessment Description

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NUR 630 Wk 2 Health Care Culture Assignment
From $8/Page
Order Essay

The purpose of this assignment is to discuss health care culture and describe how CWV can be used to improve ethical practices. In a 1,000-1,250-word essay, discuss the important factors associated with health care culture. Include the following in your essay:

  1. A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and safety.
  2. Two or three examples of principles for building a culture of excellence and safety.
  3. An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture.
  4. An explanation of how Christian worldview (CWV) principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices, whether the organizations are Christian or not.
  5. Two or three examples of how the integration of faith learning and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture.

This assignment requires a minimum of three peer-reviewed scholarly sources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Topic 2 DQ 1

Feb 1719, 2022

Using the AHRQ SOPS Surveys webpage, provided in the topic Resources, select the SOPS survey appropriate for the practice setting in which you work. Complete the survey at your site and discuss how your facility scored. What changes would you recommend based on the survey results?

Replies to Ramona Chatman

Based on the safety survey for the patient safety regarding the hospital setting for my unit which is the cath Lab. The Cath lab has areas of opportunity for improvement the area of communication patient safety. It seems that the patients are well cared for to prevent

NUR 630 Wk 2 Health Care Culture Assignment

an emergency. Such as having defibrillator pads on every heart cath patient. What is lacing is the communication about any near events for events that happening to prevent them from happening again. While patient satisfaction is paramount, staff satisfaction is also a high priority. Nurses who felt like they weren’t constantly aware of policy or unit changes received lower rankings, according to the poll. Changes that are need is a formal process to communicate events that are near miss or occurred. Conducting brief, open meetings of the cath lab promptly after complex procedures are completed or when complications occur. Discuss what went right during the procedure and what could be improved upon. Most importantly, debriefings allow the staff to have the opportunity to safely speak out about their concerns in an environment where it will not distract from patient care.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2022). Surveys on patient safety culture. 

Hmpgloballearningnetwork.com. (n.d.). Retrieved February 19, 2022, from https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/cathlab/article/Patient-Safety-Cath-Lab-Take-Time-Out-Part-I-III

Resources

Transformational Leadership Principles and Tactics for the Nurse Executive to Shift Nursing Culture

Read “Transformational Leadership Principles and Tactics for the Nurse Executive to Shift Nursing Culture,” by Pearson, from

… 

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

  • Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
  • There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
  • Include in-text citations in your response
  • Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
  • Follow APA-7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

  • A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
  • Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
  • Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
  • Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
  • Follow APA 7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
  • Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
  • Here are some helpful links
  • The is a great resource

 

 


A Network Analysis of Perioperative Communication Patterns

Read “A Network Analysis of Perioperative Communication Patterns,” by Stucky, De Jong, Kabo, and Kasper, from AORN 

… 


Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement

Read Chapter 12 in Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement.


Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care

Read Chapters 2 and 9 in Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care.

Optional:

For add

… 


Just Culture: The Foundation of Staff Safety in the Perioperative Environment

Read “Just Culture: The Foundation of Staff Safety in the Perioperative Environment,” by Fencl, Willoughby, and Jackson, from

… 


Flag the Play: Overcoming Unseen Barriers to Speak Up for Safety

Read “‘Flag the Play’: Overcoming Unseen Barriers to Speak Up for Safety,” by Hollinger, from Nursing Management (2019).

… 


Building a Culture of Safety and Quality: The Paradox of Measurement

Read “Building a Culture of Safety and Quality: The Paradox of Measurement,” by Bliss, Chambers, and Rambur, from Nursin

… 


Just Culture

Read “Just Culture,” by Ungvarsky, from Salem Press Encyclopedia of Health (2020).


Integration of Faith, Learning and Work at Grand Canyon University

Read “Integration of Faith, Learning and Work at Grand Canyon University,” located on the Grand Canyon University website. Use th

… 


SOPS Surveys

Review the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety (SOPS) surveys provided on the SOPS Surveys page of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Q

… 

Health Care Culture – Rubric

Definition of Health Care Culture

Criteria Description

Definition of Health Care Culture

5. Target

11 points

A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of safety, is present and thorough.

4. Acceptable

10.12 points

A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of safety, is present and detailed.

3. Approaching

9.68 points

A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of safety, is present.

2. Insufficient

8.8 points

A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of safety is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A definition of health care culture is not present.

Examples of How to Build a Culture of Excellence and Culture of Safety

Criteria Description

Examples of How to Build a Culture of Excellence and Culture of Safety

5. Target

12 points

Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of safety are present and thorough. All examples are appropriate.

4. Acceptable

11.04 points

Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of safety are present and detailed. Most examples are appropriate.

3. Approaching

10.56 points

Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of safety are present. Some examples are appropriate.

2. Insufficient

9.6 points

Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of safety are present, but lack details or are incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of safety are not present.

Role of Various Stakeholders in Improving Health Care Culture

Criteria Description

Role of Various Stakeholders in Improving Health Care Culture

5. Target

12 points

An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture is present and thorough.

4. Acceptable

11.04 points

An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture is present and detailed.

3. Approaching

10.56 points

An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture is present.

2. Insufficient

9.6 points

An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture is not present.

Explanation of How CWV Principles Might Be Used

Criteria Description

Explanation of How CWV Principles Might Be Used by Health Care Organizations to Improve Their Ethical Practices

5. Target

12 points

An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices is present and thorough.

4. Acceptable

11.04 points

An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices is present and detailed.

3. Approaching

10.56 points

An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices is present.

2. Insufficient

9.6 points

An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices is not present.

Examples of How the Integration of Faith, Learning, and Work

Criteria Description

Examples of How the Integration of Faith, Learning, and Work at GCU Can Be Implemented by Individuals to Improve Health Care Culture

5. Target

12 points

Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present and thorough.

4. Acceptable

11.04 points

Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present and detailed.

3. Approaching

10.56 points

Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present.

2. Insufficient

9.6 points

Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present, but lack details or are incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are not present.

Scholarly Sources

Criteria Description

Scholarly Sources

5. Target

11 points

A minimum of three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present. Sources are distinctive and address all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.

4. Acceptable

10.12 points

A minimum of three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present. Sources address all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.

3. Approaching

9.68 points

A minimum of three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present.

2. Insufficient

8.8 points

Two or three peer-reviewed, sources are present, but are not scholarly. Limited research is present.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are not present.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target

7 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable

6.44 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

3. Approaching

6.16 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

2. Insufficient

5.6 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Criteria Description

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

5. Target

8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

4. Acceptable

7.36 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

3. Approaching

7.04 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

2. Insufficient

6.4 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

Evidence

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

5. Target

5 points

Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.

4. Acceptable

4.6 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.

3. Approaching

4.4 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

2. Insufficient

4 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

Mechanics of Writing

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Target

5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable

4.6 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching

4.4 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient

4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

Format/Documentation

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

5. Target

5 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

4. Acceptable

4.6 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching

4.4 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

2. Insufficient

4 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 100 points

Health Care Culture (Week 2 DQ 2)

Given that human errors should be considered as expected events, healthcare institutions are required to routinize processes aimed at the prevention of human error and limit the negative consequences associated with the error. One most common form of human error in the healthcare industry is medication error. In the United States, approximately 1.5 million patients are adversely affected by medication errors every year (Jones & Treiber, 2018). The provided case study demonstrates two nurses making medication errors, where one leads to adverse events whereas the other one does not.

In such a situation, both the two nurses should face similar consequences. A just culture is considered a value-based culture that promotes shared accountability, hence demands that the situation be dealt with similarly. However, before deciding on which kind of punishment to give, an investigator must be involved, to determine the cause of the medication error, whether it was due to the system, negligence or the nurses just failed to pay attention to following hospital protocols (Jones & Treiber, 2018). Once the cause of the problem has been identified, a corrective measure should follow based on the outcome. This helps promote a sense of accountability, helping the nurse to avoid such errors in the future.

Consequently, in a just culture, clinicians are required to share responsibility for promoting patient safety and the quality of care provided (Marx, 2019). As such, there should be no blame as to who caused the most damage, but rather, the nurses should both share the blame for making the medication error equally, and determine whether there were any system factors contributing to the error. However, if the nurse tends to undermine the hospital policy and frequently cause medication errors, then they should take responsibility for their action and suffer the necessary consequences.

References

Marx, D. (2019). Patient safety and the just culture. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics46(2), 239-245.

Jones, J. H., & Treiber, L. A. (2018, July). Nurses’ rights of medication administration: Including authority with accountability and responsibility. In Nursing forum (Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 299-303).

 

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 20% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Top Writers 4Me
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 10k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Other
I appreciate the help.
Customer 452567, March 18th, 2022
Group Dynamics
Great job. I appreciate it.
Customer 452521, November 22nd, 2021
Healthcare Writing & Communications
Perfect! Thank you so much for all of your help!
Customer 452483, October 31st, 2021
Psychology
Thank you for all of your help and hard work, truly appreciate you guys always being there with my hectic schedule. Thank you again!
Customer 452483, September 20th, 2021
Microbiology
Perfect! Thank you guys for all of your great help! :)
Customer 452483, August 23rd, 2021
Nursing
Excellent! Thank you.
Customer 452487, October 16th, 2021
Healthcare Writing & Communications
Perfect! Thank you for also remembering to highlight the necessary words. Appreciate all of your help and hard work!
Customer 452483, November 7th, 2021
English 101
This writer was very quick with the draft and even faster with the revision! Thank you!
Customer 452603, May 30th, 2022
Education
Thank you for your help
Customer 452555, February 16th, 2022
Healthcare Writing & Communications
Excellent!! You’re awesome, thank you very much for all of your hard work & help!!
Customer 452483, October 24th, 2021
Nursing
Excellent!!! Thank you.
Customer 452487, September 13th, 2021
Nursing
Good job. Thank you
Customer 452487, September 16th, 2021
1159
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
2 pages
Average paper length
47%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
20% OFF your first order
Use a coupon TOP20 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 20% OFF Order in Chat