Assignment: Community Teaching Work Plan

Want create site? With you can do it easy.

Assignment: Community Teaching Work Plan

Assignment: Community Teaching Work Plan

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Assignment: Community Teaching Work Plan
From $8/Page
Order Essay

Note: This is an individual assignment. Applying what you have   learned thus far, develop a community teaching proposal designed to   address the needs of  your community.

Select one of the following as the focus for the teaching plan:

Primary Prevention/Health Promotion
Secondary     Prevention/Screenings for a Vulnerable Population
Bioterrorism/Disaster
Environmental Issues
Complete the “Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal.” This   will help you organize your plan and create an outline for the written assignment.

After completing the teaching proposal, review the teaching     plan with a community health and public health provider in your     local community.
Request feedback (strengths and     opportunities for improvement) from the provider.
Complete     the “Community Teaching Experience” form.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA   Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to   beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for   successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Nursing Diagnosis
Nursing diagnosis relates to health seeking and self care activities. Those activities include

accepting the responsibility of self-care, identification of progress and the elimination of the negative health care practice, initiating the program needed for stress reduction, being active for seeking knowledge regarding disease process or medical treatment (Stanhope & Lancaster, 2000).

Readiness for Learning
Readiness for learning is very much important. Nurses have to connect with the patients emotionally and practically for understanding their problem. Learning with other professionals and students will make the learners more efficient member of social care or health care team. Group learning will help the learners to understand the limitations of the profession. Discussion of the problems within a social-care team will be fruitful.

Learning Theory to Be Utilized
The salutogenic theory may be utilized for the program regarding health promotion. The theory is designed for enhancing the health promoting program. It focuses on the health of the person not the disease of the person. Before the application of the theory, the theory must be understood by the students very clearly.

 

324 × 420
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

Community Teaching Plan: Teaching Experience Paper – Rubric

Comprehensive Summary of Teaching Plan

Criteria Description

Comprehensive Summary of Teaching Plan

5. Excellent

15 points

Focus of community teaching is clear, consistent with community teaching plan, detailed, and well supported. The presentation demonstrates an ability to create effective teaching plans relative to a population.

4. Good

12.75 points

Community teaching plan is clear with a detailed summary of each component. Minor rationale is needed for clarity or support.

3. Satisfactory

11.25 points

Summary of community teaching plan is offered, but some elements are vague. Some rationale or evidence is needed for clarity and support.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

9.75 points

Summary of community teaching plan is incomplete. Overall, the teaching plan is unclear.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Summary of community teaching plan is omitted.

Epidemiological Rationale for Topic

Criteria Description

Epidemiological Rationale for Topic

5. Excellent

15 points

Strong epidemiological rationale is provided and demonstrates support for the topic presented.

4. Good

12.75 points

Epidemiological rationale is provided and provides general support for the topic. Some detail is needed for clarity.

3. Satisfactory

11.25 points

Epidemiological rationale is summarized and provides some support for the topic. More information or evidence is needed for support.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

9.75 points

Epidemiological rationale is unclear or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Epidemiological rationale for the topic is omitted.

Evaluation of Teaching Experience

Criteria Description

Evaluation of Teaching Experience

5. Excellent

20 points

A comprehensive evaluation of teaching experience is presented. Insight into self-appraisal in regard to teaching is demonstrated.

4. Good

17 points

Evaluation of the teaching experience is generally presented. Some detail is needed for clarity.

3. Satisfactory

15 points

Evaluation of teaching experience is summarized. Some aspects are vague. More detail is needed to fully illustrate an assessment of the experience.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

13 points

Evaluation of teaching experience is unclear or underdeveloped. The narrative is not written in a manner that evaluates the experience.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Evaluation of teaching experience is omitted or incomplete.

Community Response to Teaching Provided

Criteria Description

Community Response to Teaching Provided

5. Excellent

15 points

A detailed description of community response to teaching is presented.

4. Good

12.75 points

A description of community response to teaching is generally presented. Some information is needed for support or clarity.

3. Satisfactory

11.25 points

A summary of the community response to teaching is presented. Some areas are unclear. More information is needed for support or clarity.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

9.75 points

Community response to teaching is partially summarized. More information is needed.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Community response to teaching is omitted.

Areas of Strength and Improvement

Criteria Description

Areas of Strength and Improvement

5. Excellent

15 points

Areas of strength and improvement are thoroughly discussed. The author demonstrates insight into personal strengths and areas where improvement would be beneficial.

4. Good

12.75 points

Areas of strength and improvement are discussed.

3. Satisfactory

11.25 points

Areas of strength and improvement are generally discussed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

9.75 points

Areas of strength and improvement are partially discussed.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Areas of strength and improvement are omitted.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent

5 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. Good

4.25 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory

3.75 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3.25 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. Excellent

5 points

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Good

4.25 points

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory

3.75 points

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3.25 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

4.25 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory

3.75 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3.25 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent

2 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Good

1.7 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Satisfactory

1.5 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

1.3 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

3 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

2.55 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

2.25 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

1.95 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 100 points
Did you find apk for android? You can find new and apps.

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 20% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Top Writers 4Me
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 10k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Nursing
Good job!! Thank you!!!
Customer 452487, September 9th, 2021
Healthcare Writing & Communications
Perfect! Thank you for also remembering to highlight the necessary words. Appreciate all of your help and hard work!
Customer 452483, November 7th, 2021
Group Dynamics
Great job. I appreciate it.
Customer 452521, November 22nd, 2021
Microbiology
Appreciate all of your hard work! Thank you so much!!
Customer 452483, September 14th, 2021
English 101
Thank you guys for always being there and helping me always get a 100% on my assignments!
Customer 452483, August 16th, 2021
Healthcare Writing & Communications
Excellent!! You’re awesome, thank you very much for all of your hard work & help!!
Customer 452483, October 24th, 2021
Nursing
Good job. Thank you
Customer 452487, September 16th, 2021
Sociology
Thank you so much! Appreciate it!
Customer 452483, November 8th, 2021
Nursing
Excellent writing !! Definitely I will use your services again... Thank you.
Customer 452487, August 22nd, 2021
Mathematics
Thank you so much!
Customer 452483, July 26th, 2021
Nursing
Excellent! Thank you.
Customer 452487, October 16th, 2021
English 101
Amazing thank you!
Customer 452615, August 1st, 2022
1159
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
2 pages
Average paper length
47%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
20% OFF your first order
Use a coupon TOP20 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 20% OFF Order in Chat